So assuming a 49% deal goes ahead, do you feel that in that deal the “buyer” will end up with:
(a) 49% of the shares of the company we know as PLS;
(b) 49% of the shares or other ownership structure of a new entity into which the assets of PLS comprising the Pilgangoora project (thus not including for example PLS’ interests in the POSCO JV) are transferred; or
(c) some other arrangement?
Ann: 2019 Diggers and Dealers Corporate Presentation, page-61
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.06 |
Change
0.040(1.32%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.210B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.04 | $3.12 | $3.02 | $47.88M | 15.58M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | 321604 | $3.06 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.07 | 269930 | 12 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLS (ASX) Chart |