It may well be the reason the tenant is related is the appetite in the market for these assets is thin or non existent? Is it possible the very reason RFM need to be tenant is others are less interested to operate these assets? Is it possible therefore that the rents being paid are in fact overstated?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RFF
- Ann: Response to Bonitas Research report
Ann: Response to Bonitas Research report, page-296
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RFF (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$2.05 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $795.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$2.04 | $2.05 | $2.03 | $601.4K | 294.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 7794 | $2.03 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$2.05 | 10348 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 7794 | 2.030 |
8 | 27364 | 2.020 |
14 | 84665 | 2.010 |
43 | 111825 | 2.000 |
3 | 12862 | 1.995 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.050 | 10348 | 4 |
2.060 | 4152 | 2 |
2.070 | 2415 | 1 |
2.080 | 2009 | 2 |
2.090 | 9709 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 25/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RFF (ASX) Chart |