AVZ Peer Transparency, page-56

Thanks @Scarpa , it seems the info on lithium sulphate from mine to product is inchoate at best.

PSC has a different process flow, and have lithium sulphate as precursor to hydroxide and carbonate in their pilot testing........ PSC also have Lithium sulphate as the input for either lithium carbonate or lithium hydroxide. So, there could be a market to supply lithium sulphate if a converter only wanted to do the final part of the process. https://www.prospectresources.com.au/sites/default/files/asx-announcements/6873732.pdf

On the subject of power, I think the 63MwH is actually 64 MW. RM Equity note it as such. http://www.rmresearch.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/RMResearch_AVZ_20190528.pdf
From the notes I have it is possible this 64MW can be further expanded with another water race etc……….. and IMO, a hydroxide plant would be possible on site in that scenario.

At this stage though it looks like they are going light on the chemicals.

DFS will be interesting to say least.

All IMO & DYOR