How come this circumvention is allowed. Surely if you circumvent something and do what on the face of it is a related party transaction someone should be held accountable and someone should be facing court. I cannot believe that you are ordered to pay something back do so and immediately allowed to move those funds in another related party transaction or am I missing something?
When I read these events I start getting very wary of investing in small financial operators...
Ann: TOV: BHD Panel Receives Variation Request and Applications, page-8
Add BHD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.434M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 50721 | 22.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0¢ | 40000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 18/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BHD (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable