someone else should check what they have used to get such a different IRR from original values.
My back of envelope calculation:
As an example just by changing the time period the first value below is 17% and the second is 37%
using IRR equals FV/PV All to power of reciprocal of time period and minus 1 from this result.
Thus
at 8 years using say FV of 3000 and PV of 850 gives 17% for IRR
BUT
same calculation and changing time period to 4 years gives 37% for IRR
DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- KIN
- Ann: PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY AND UPDATED ORE RESERVE FOR CGP
Ann: PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY AND UPDATED ORE RESERVE FOR CGP, page-58
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add KIN (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online