can someone please explain why????, page-26

The article has made a malicious inference running separate statements together that are not financially related. I'd love to see ABC's Media Watch pull this article apart to demonstrate intent.

Direct quote from smh link is:
"There is no suggestion that iSignthis has been involved in any wrongdoing. But the move on its customers could raise concerns about the financial performance of the company, which was valued at $1.8 billion last week but reported revenue of just $7.5 million for the June half year."

SMH ambiguously states the company "reported revenue of just $7.5 million for the June half year".



Enjoy your break Tradie and enjoy your time away from HC.