Directionally correct but not accurate!
Return on Investment
1. Well Costs through completion and connection
a. 35 wells is $5.2 by the end of CY2008
b. 94 wells is $14.m by end of CY2009
2. Income model
• 35 wells this year instead of 44
• 94 wells by the end of 2009
• First plant is predicted to be at capacity by Oct or Nov. CY2008
• Second plant completed by Feb and fully operational by May CY2009
• Income based on first plant capacity
o Low at 2,500 mmcf x $11 x 365 days = $10m a year
o High at 4,000mmcf x $11 x 365 days = $16m a year
o 75% interest until the second plant comes online
• Income based on first plant and the addition of the second plant capacity
o Second plant at 7,000 to 10,000 mmcf online between Feb and May CY2009
o 100%of the plant goes to Austin giving it additional capacity
Low at 2,500 + 7,000 = 9,500 x $11 x 365 = $38m a year
High at 4,000 + 7,000 + 11,000 x $11 x 365 = $44m a year
56.25% nri to Austin
This does not include the oil.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AKK
- get it right
get it right
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AKK (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online