You didn't post the date and time of this m..y fool article above. You need to when posting. This article has already been posted today. Plus another similar m..y-fool report, same author, from yesterday/day before.
I have reported m-y fool's recent posts re ISX to a few other 'parties' as an example of damaging, *non-factual, malicious misreporting - hence there is potential litigious action which could be taken by ISX in relation to this article above and other online media publications.
(*Non-factual information: adjective. not based on fact; false; opinion statement in which someone tries to convince someone else).
My definition of litigious in this context is: suitable to become the subject of a lawsuit.
Don't forget, motley fool, similar to 9EC's publications (AFR, SMH, The Age) want to attract attention/viewers and convert them to paid subscribers. Not doing well obviously, as motley fool, similar to AFR, SMH, The Age are publishing a lot of their content online for free and e.g. accessible via a Google search or on twitter.
9EC are also wanting google and facebook to share the profits of any online traffic (Source: The Australian newspaper - content available by subscription only).
Expand