Ann: Path to Finalise Environmental Impact Assessment, page-33

NRO,
As usual you are wrong on everything you said in your post.

First, what happened yesterday WAS NOT GOOD NEWS, the GOG rejected the 2019 EIA, the company must again, start again.

They will be required to do the sampling again, this time from the ore body itself and not from a tailings dump that has been washed by the weather since 1970. Nice try by the company to mask the fluorine problem but also, totally dishonest.

The redo, I am told by a Greenland consultant, will take at least a year and cost between 10 and 20 million dollars. ITS NOT A 3 MONTH PROBLEM OR DELAY, IT IS A ONE YEAR MINIMUM PROBLEM MINIMUM AND WILL COST BETWEEN 10 to 20 MILLION DOLLARS.

Now, as to your false statements. The bulk sample DID COME "ONLY" from the old tailings dump, no question about it. READ THE GREENLANDIC NEWS, everyone knows it except you. And no I won't find it for you, find it yourself.

As usual NRO, you provided no proof that samples also came from somewhere else, because you can't because they didn't. As you know the company provided the samples from the tailings dump to the consult, and it was the company who told the consultants that the ore they received was a representative sample, which was absolutely false and the company knew it.

And again, everyone on this post is talking about the company letter being good news! How is another rejected EIA good news?

And once again, we have only heard what the company said about what the Greenland government said. The Company should release the complete communication from the Greenland Government to the ASX and to we the shareholders immediately. They might as well do so, if they don't it will leak soon anyway, and if the company has not told us the straight and the whole story. it will look like they are covering up again.

By the way, how was your holiday? You must hnot ave gone far. You also must be able to relax and recharge quickly as you were only gone for about 20 hours.

Ciao