It is material to your argument, it goes to how can you present your analysis of facts with confidence and belief but then when confused with geography put hands in the air and shout 'whatever' like some facts are important but others less so but never the less you expect 'your facts' to be credible?
Ann: Response to ASX Query Letter, page-268
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 808 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)