160m of net coal, page-31

Hello Grangeh
Yes, we are still waiting for our guru Sav-J to guide and lead us towards our enlightened paths.
However in the meantime just some trivia to think about.. probably relates to some of your earlier comments today also.

In todays announcement I think the most significant message (part) has not at all at all been discussed by anyone
Extracting from announcement..
"Preliminary interpretation of electric logs at Blamore 1 have indicated a net Permian coal sequence of slightly over 160m, approximately 4 times the net thickness expected. The coal sequences, while being drilled, exhibited a range of high gas readings including peaks up to 233 units (1 unit equals 100 parts per million – ppm) and a range of gases from C1 (methane) to C5 (pentane) suggesting a higher calorific value than typical Coal Bed Methane gases. This Permian sequence of coals will be further tested in Coal Bed Methane well CBM 93001, the next well to be drilled."
What about this part...
Although reports stated 233 units and keeping in mind there were only about 10 reported readings layers given over 10 days of drilling (the 233 which equals 233 X 100 = 23300 parts per million OR 2.3 % as a maximum readings ). However these values were all under mud, water and drilling conditions and at best probably probably reflect ordinary below REAL readings. Probability values eventually would all exceed X2 or X3 or X4 (times) easily or more.
Coupled with the 160 m depth and pressures acting I would think we are in for absolutely "PLATINUM" dimensions of electric logging results (coming SOON) AND given also the unheard of depth of 160m of THE coal seam. (Again NOT SEEN TOO OFTEN in many other explorer findings depths uncovered for coal beds - very often only being up to 50 metres only or less ).
Cheers for now Grangeh.
We should all be waiting with baited breathe for LOGGING DATA. JH we await your news.