anyone see a reason to fill the board with 3 of the same type of characters
there is one up for the-election
anyone got an opinion from either meeting him or hearing from him
but for me 3 corporate advisors/ business / business analysts is at a minimum 2 too many
because from what I see
they have little clue of how to make good business moves
so a change to the Norms seems a good idea to me
gets done other experience on the board
so far they are 3 for nout on making stuff happen
and even if this was 2c or 5c I'd still be making the same comments
thoughts
also any thoughts on Resolution 8
proportional takeover provisions
which the board are pushing to get approved
are they concerned about new top 20 holders or is this something else that's new on AGM's
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RMX
- AGM Resolutions
AGM Resolutions
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RMX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.873M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | $1.751K | 1.750M |
Featured News
RMX (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online