Firstly BLA wanted to get rid of BAF due to the "discounted" fees vs costs. Then they said they want to hold on to it because somehow the manager of BAF not being BLA would be bad for holder at the fund level. Sounds suss and logically invalid as usual. As with most of bluesky a conflict of interest reaches its logical conclusion.
Ann: Market Valuation of the BAF Investment Portfolio, page-5
Add WMA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
97.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(0.51%) |
Mkt cap ! $191.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 98.0¢ | 98.0¢ | 97.5¢ | $89.96K | 91.98K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27830 | 97.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 98.0¢ | 588 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.53pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WMA (ASX) Chart |