Share
5,147 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 60
clock Created with Sketch.
09/12/19
00:08
Share
Originally posted by madamswer
↑
How about as a start, in less than 50 words, you clearly state why (if?) you disagree with the main conclusion of 99% of the published climate science?
I don't believe I'm even remotely in a position to either agree or disagree with the main conclusion of 99% of the published science for a host of reasons, not least of which being I am not able to obtain 100% of the published science, let alone study it all in order to come to a view whether or not 99% of it is definitively accurate.
(And it is preposterous to suggest that any human being alive is able to do so.)
Besides, that is all completely moot, anyway, because even if I was force-ably injected with a magical serum that made me believe that I had somehow studied 100% of the science and had concluded that 99% of it was accurate, it would still not bring me to an understanding about what is to be done about it.
,
Expand
You don't have to be in any position. You either accept the overwhelming view that 99% of refereed climate science publications confirm that AGW is a real phenomenon or you can continue to waffle on like you just have. Tell me HAL what do you really think?