Schiff caught out Lying again, page-141

Re "You are welcome to post where Robinson pleaded not guilty, but until then, all we have got is his guilty plea, as noted in the court documents (Decision on Penalty, July 2019)."

He pleaded guilty in Leeds in what was later described as confused circumstances, that is what the "guilty" reference in the court document relates to. The appeal found the proceedings were flawed, but the original plea was still considered in his sentencing. He did not plead guilty to the fresh charges in London. I note you don't answer any questions with any degree of intellectual honesty, but could you at least try with this one. If you were going to make an appeal for asylum to an incumbent US president in relation to trial charges you were facing, do you think you'd walk into court on the first day of that same trial and immediately plead guilty and then spend the next two days wasting the court's time by contesting the same charges you've just pleaded guilty to. Would you then go outside and talk about your innocence to a supportive crowd outside the court? Do you think your asylum appeal would look like an act of lunacy, if you had voluntarily admitted your guilt to the highest court in Britain?

"That is obstruction, just because you make excuses for it, it doesn't stop it from being obstruction."

Back to the nonsense around Trump. So you think you can categorically say it is obstruction, while, at the same time, the legal team around Trump were incapable of recognising the same when advising their own man. You must have some special insight.

The left are out to get him, no one should seriously believes this rubbish. The chain of people involved before it got to Adam Schiff said there was no case to answer. It has been a cock up for the past 3 years. Not one serious charge from 3 years of investigation have stuck. The Democrats are desperate to take Trump out because they fear annihilation in 2020, that's all this is about.