I"m hoping someone will ask that today in the Melbourne roadshow. If not, I'll personally ask this question as well.
Yes, whether they can find a way to do this legal or not, it doesn't show the intend in the performance shares. Reading the original performance C, classifications, surely, the intend is to show/prove that FBR can be revenue generating. If they have to resort to essentially, get a CR/SPP, to be in a JV, then use the JV to "buy" the HX to show revenue, its just too bloody circular for my taste. I hope they are aware of this. The optics is very bad in my opinion.
Melbourne Roadshow, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 87 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FBR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.2¢ |
Change
0.002(6.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $142.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.1¢ | 3.4¢ | 3.0¢ | $330.9K | 10.38M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 1622902 | 3.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2¢ | 529330 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.25pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FBR (ASX) Chart |