It's not so easy anymore to pick the good guys from the bad guys. The commies are now the capitalists and the capitalists are now the commies (the US govt is bailing out the bankers who caused the banking crisis in the first place, with public money).So who's who in the zoo? With any crime, a good detective will follow the money trail, in other words, who has the most to gain from the crime? Who for instance , has gained the most from the 'war on terror'? That wouldn't be the population of say Saudi Arabia, which is ruled by an undemocratic feifdom which is becoming fabulously richer by the day, and yet no one is crying out for them to install democracy. Maybe it's the general population of say Kuwait or the UAE, has anyone 'demanded' that their gov't introduce democratic reforms? NO. But for some reason we demand and enforce that Iraq become democratic! Is this some sort of hypocrisy or not?
If these countries didn't have any oil would we even care what happened in their country? If it was Saudis who caused 911 why didn't we attack Saudi Arabia? Why didn't we demand THEY become democratic? Maybe companies such as Raytheon and Halliburton who made $billions out of the 'war against terrorism' have left a few fingerprints, but who would care, as most sheeple are more interested in who won the latest 'Idol Show' or which Movie hero is up who! And if one is truly looking for answers to the above, don't look to the 6 o'clock news!
