It'll be a hoot when he cherry picks dodgy data from one night, throws it into a chart with dodgy X and Y axis's and presents the 'trend' as 'proof' of something or other.
Which of course brings it back the the very first scientific question they always avoid.....Why, if the data is so strong, is it so regularly misrepresented?
Let alone the logical followup......if you are genuine about your concerns why do you allow misrepresentations to continue......?
rather, all we get is the standard head in the sand.....What misrepresentations!!??
