Ann: Notice of Meeting, page-3

Hi Trade138,
Just trying to follow the chronology here:
- 249D issued and meeting (voting) scheduled for 6th Jan (voting to admit Bennett to the board).
- then an ann advising a request to ASIC seeking to delay that meeting (new date unknown?).
- now a vote on 31 Jan to ratify the follow-on convertible note.
It appears to be unknown whether Bennett would have met the board by that point in time.
These actions give some insight into the results of the voting on that matter - I'd postulate that it has been another resounding message to the company management.

Bennett is only interested in a higher level of scrutiny and accountability, now why do they fight tooth and nail to prevent that occurring?
Company continues to send the wrong messages to SH's.