Banter and General Comments, page-12991

I can see both sides of the argument.

the reality is that the share price is off over 80% in less than 24 months so everything is heavily scrutinised by the market.

shareholders are pissed. That a fact.

soooo what are they going to do about it? Progress and update? Or delay and find excuses

this is black and white IMO

saying things like “shipments will be skewed to second half” to discover that this was not the case, is a slap in the face to long term holders.

However, on the flip side and can easily envisage a situation where management are acting in shareholders best interests by retaining as tight lipped as possible. I bet they hate the fact we have access to satellite imagery on a 5 day rolling basis, allowing us to identify progress.

change at the board level is required.