Per figures from Greta, Greenies, through fighting back burning etc.. linked to 500 million animals dead!!, page-2

  1. 12,946 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 190

    It's time to put the misinformation about hazard reduction burns to bed. This is a false narrative that's being propagated by the interests of the fossil fuel lobby. It's a political tool, but more importantly it's a deliberate attempt to divert attention away from the scientifically proven link between the climate crisis and the intensity and frequency of fires.

    - Fire ecologists and fire-fighters have repeatedly made it clear that lack of fuel-reduction burns aren't a significant factor in these fires.
    - A recent Australian Council of Emergency Services inquiry into major fire events last summer concluded the same.
    - Fuel reduction burns are tightly regulated by necessity and with extensive consultation with fire services, because they have caused and continue to cause so many damaging fires.
    - For example, prior to the introduction of regulations, the 1967 fires in Tasmania, which claimed 69 lives and over 2000 homes, were a conflagration of escaped fuel-reduction burns by industry and private land-owners.
    - Where reducing fuel loads is required, climate change is shortening safe burning periods
    - Major funding cuts to National Parks and Firefighting services have limited resources for completing fuel reduction burns.
    - Hazard reduction burn regimes are devised by fire-fighters, not by politicians.

    Read more about hazard reduction burns and bushfires here: https://mobile.abc.net.au/…/hazard-reduction-burns…/11817336?

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.