The initial poster and the first reply would appear to have no appreciation of relative evaporation rates across the projects within WA.
Perhaps they only listen to posters like yourself rather than broken records.
Evaporation is like grade. Companies only talk about it when they have something exceptional to talk about. You must have noted how SO4 started to talk up grade when they got some at Lake Way? CEOs like to talk up proximity to infrastructure and name drop the share registry but unlike both these, physical factors such as brine flow, grade and evaporation can't be enhanced and certainly can't be manipulated like financial model assumptions.
Despite what you may think I hope APC makes solid progress. The WA projects vary but I think success will breed success. Anyone interested in any project would be foolish not to be following the peers and wishing them well. If KLL or SO4 fail on technical grounds there will be question marks surrounding those that follow.
It will be interesting to see if APC can do what SO4 didn't do and that is turn MOU's into binding off takes. And the WA EPA webpage remains unchanged. The approvals in place are still not in place.
Happy new year!
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
