It should be better if they set a low base. They will achieve way higher growth over the coming years.
For example, if they have a goal of first year 60m, second year 65m and third year 80m for the next 3 years, total earning of 205m. growth will be 0%, 8% and 22%. Alternatively, they could set the first base low like 40m, then 60m, 105m, total 205m as well. But growth will be - 33%, 50% and 100% which is a lot more attractive than 0, 8 and 20%.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BKL
- BKL's Problems Run Deeper Than China!
BKL's Problems Run Deeper Than China!, page-47
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)