I expect it to continue improving as the loggers get their eye in, especially after early Oct when the first assays came back as feedback. Mind, they would have been improving simply based on the auger assays that came back earlier. Panning sand from an auger or aircore drill sample is exactly the same.
Secondly, I have noted that the 'percentage undercall' is lower in high grade samples than low grade. Being 2% under on a 2% visual log is 100% undercall. Being 2% under on a 10% vis log is only a 20% undercall.
Methodical delivery of MRQ results by Management, page-137
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MRQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
-0.001(12.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.490M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.3¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | $1.154K | 331.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | 24103690 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 18324860 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.56pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MRQ (ASX) Chart |