Thanks for posting @inspyah.
So to summarise;
The article quotes JK saying he is a QUALIFIED patent attorney, but uses as evidence the Attorneys board of REGISTERED patent attorneys. Plenty of people are qualified in a profession but not registered. Nothing untoward there.
And as @inspyah has stated JK is perfectly entitled to use LLM.
Unless anyone has anything else contrary to add. It's pretty much made the entire article a big pile of nothing.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- Email to holders re. Allegations of CV fraud
Email to holders re. Allegations of CV fraud, page-85
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 112 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)