You clearly didn't read the paper, or didn't understand it. Seems to be a theme.
I expected you'd run off with another total misrepresentation/misunderstanding of that paper and that I was likely handing you the opportunity to Dunning Kruger your way into further mistakes. But I'd rather have a potentially interesting discussion and share potentially interesting stuff with others than cater for your false reads on this stuff.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- IPCC energy budget logic and then the real World
IPCC energy budget logic and then the real World, page-121
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 49 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review
NEWS
Breakthrough programs slash healthcare events, driving a significant A$1.8M+ annual revenue boost