I would have preferred ‘structurally and genetically related’ to have been used together.
The gold was always going to be genetically linked by same source or mineralisation event irrespective of host rock.
Removing the structurally related wording increases potential that the two zones don’t link phyically/spatially, reducing tonnes and ounces.
Ann: Major extension of sulphide mineralisation at Hemi, page-101
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 149 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DEG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.21 |
Change
0.055(4.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.899B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.19 | $1.21 | $1.19 | $9.324M | 7.770M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 33645 | $1.21 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.21 | 12149 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DEG (ASX) Chart |