oly, simply that ARUP's +/-10% will enable sign off from future SPV partners. +/- 25-30% is too wide and reflects insufficient dd for Capex applications (in the eyes of co. bean counters and lenders). Stating 25 or 30% (which is it??) adds further opaqueness, which works fine in the US for unsecured fiscal lending policy (insert acronym).
A quote from Oliver Twist comes to mind. Wait for ARUP and do it properly.
no more tree shaking, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.343M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $10.34K | 5.173M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3081503 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 14303561 | 22 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.24pm 07/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |