Dubious and potentially DANGEROUS claims questioned by some researchers., page-111

why on earth would a non-holder dedicate so much of his/her time to disproving product that has been so thoroughly proven? I'm genuinely struggling to see what you have to gain here? hypothetically, if you prove to us that this product is bogus, what then? we sell and the share price drops...OK then, its not like you'll get a medal? If you genuinely did believe this product was bogus, surely the stock holders aren't the people you should be trying to convince, maybe suitable authorities? Anyone with a granule of common sense sees through your facade - there is no way you're simply not down-ramping ZNO just as an attempt to lower SP. What happened? You went short and lost a lot and are now trying to claw your way back?