It isn't clear what response you are requesting. I stated that we set out "to refute Mr. Bretherton’s falsehoods and to discredit his methods." You have atempted to transform that into, "to discredit shareholder Matthew Bretherton and his legitimate right to hold an EGM."
Since these are manifestly different things, it seems impossible to credit that you really think them the same. Indeed, I have explicitly stated a few posts back that I agreed that Mr. Bretherton has the right to call a meeting and that one is happening next week.
I note that not even one specific assertion put forward by the company in its response to Thooruna's dirt sheet has been challenged. I think we're entitled to draw the obvious conclusion from that.
EFT Price at posting:
4.3¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held