"Given where the company is now placed I think it's less relevant than say 5 years ago. Management have a lot on their plate this year and while I wanted to have my whinge I can see why (particularly with COVID) it was expedient for them to raise capital in this way. Given the last 2 raises have been at only modest discounts and recent performance I think their position is defensible."
So a transfer of value from retail shareholders to institutional mates of brokers is, in fact, defensible sometimes?
In this particular case, it is because the company is placed differently to where it was in the past (whatever that means) and because "management have a lot on their plate".
And why "recent performance" (whatever that means) precludes a company from including retail shareholders in discounted capital raisings is, simply, bizarre reasoning.
I wonder how all these extraordinary lines of reasoning would align with Steven Mayne's view of the world.
.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ANZ
- Ann: ANZ 1H 2020 Results Presentation & Investor Discussion Pack
Ann: ANZ 1H 2020 Results Presentation & Investor Discussion Pack, page-158
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ANZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$29.59 |
Change
0.400(1.37%) |
Mkt cap ! $88.78B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$29.51 | $29.70 | $29.37 | $169.6M | 5.745M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 1149 | $29.55 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$29.59 | 12028 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 17 | 29.550 |
1 | 56 | 29.530 |
1 | 500 | 29.510 |
3 | 15152 | 29.500 |
2 | 10509 | 29.480 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
29.590 | 12028 | 1 |
29.600 | 33101 | 14 |
29.610 | 12217 | 1 |
29.620 | 42273 | 3 |
29.630 | 22730 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ANZ (ASX) Chart |