Hi @cptchop. I requested my two previous posts to be removed and will address your post as a right of reply.
Every member of this forum has a right to post content based on what they believe is right, which I appreciate you acknowledged in your opening remarks.
As to 1.why I am still posting and 2.my track record:
1. I am a shareholder who openly declares previous interests with the company, CGB, in my signature.
2. My track record shows that I am a data researcher. It also states that as a rule, I do not attack, belittle or undermine other posters. I always try to help through clarification or at times apologise, or withdraw posts based on if I am wrong or I may feel the post no longer contributes to the debate.
You state in your posts: I quote... "an industry which has been plagued by companies like CGB who have a management (maybe other than Andrew K) who looked to just cash in to the weed rush with absolutely ZERO direction."
As a significant shareholder, who has been at the coalface of this company for the past 2.5 years, I reject and strongly disagree with the premise 45526980.... the company's management is looking to cash in on the weed rush and has Zero direction. (sic)
@cptchop I would be interested to read any factual documents that support your conclusions.
....59
CGB Price at posting:
0.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held