I think this is more a case of that consent wasn't sought as opposed to consent was denied. As asking consent to say in a prospectus that the appointed auditor is the auditor of the company seems a little trivial, in my opinion.
I also believe that to remove an auditor will likely require a special resolution of the shareholders or if Nexia were to resign then I believe ASIC would be required to provide consent. If Nexia had resigned I would have thought that CGB would have to disclose this under their continuous disclosure obligations - though I am happy to be corrected on this requirement.
CGB Price at posting:
0.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held