bye bob, page-4

i, like many, are finding it very hard to continually sing the praises of the brt board and the good they have been doing.

a competent board would (a) ensure the survival of brt, (b) not claim market pressures caused its demise, (c) continually inform the market on how brt is progressing without any long lapses of "FYI" (no news is good news).

--- incidently, did we get the financing or not?

--- are we trading insolvently, as a result, as indicately in one terse announcement --- or not?

brt talking about, yet new (non-toy?) businesses really bothers me big time.

didn't BRT, in another life, have something to do with automobiles?

didn't this business leave the ASX for several years (and hold up their stock holders funds at the same time), before returning to the ASX under a new name, splutting the SP and highly diluting shareholder value at the same time, before doing their IPO in March 2005 to gather the next round of 'freshfaces'.... (i was very kind with the last word).

what next? maybe enter the financial industry and become a global mezzanine funder... perhaps then they could loan themselves some money to scrape brt off the gutter.

/* sarcasm -- what sarcasm?? */