EBITDA is relevant because it would appear that their banking covenant is written as a multiple of DEBT over EBITDA... that might be silly, wrong or disagreeable - I have no opinion on it - but thats what it seems to be.
What it isnt is DEBT over NPAT ... or any other indicator!
If DEBT / EBITDA >= 4.5 then the banks move in... out with the red pen.
DEBT = 42bn
... therefore if EBITDA <= 9.3bn ...out with the red pen... banks move in.
Hence the supreme relevance of EBITDA to RIO.
$5 within a month, page-20
Add RIO (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$116.28 |
Change
-3.190(2.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $43.20B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $116.50 | $116.87 | $115.90 | $50.11M | 430.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | $116.26 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $116.28 | 82 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.10pm 12/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RIO (ASX) Chart |