is steve keen correct.., page-4

  1. 1,730 Posts.
    Good post Markco2.

    Your question - Is Australian property immune?
    I don't think it is. I have sold a cheap house recently and my first "buyer" fell threw. He had a verbal agreement with a large bank and when he went to finalise the finance they turned him down.

    The house was only $250k and he had a deposit of $88k.

    The second buyer had $150k in equity on another house and still had a little trouble getting finance.

    My agent told me this has been quite a regular pattern of late.

    What does this tell us?
    Are banks no longer willing to hand out large amounts of money?
    Are no deposits a thing of the past?
    How will this effect houses in the $500k+ range?

    I know many people with large loan and small wages. Would they get that loan today? Not a chance in my opinion.

    It doesn't paint a good picture. On top of a slowing economy, job losses and fear. I can only speak for my lowly priced property and there is still quite a high demand for cheap housing. However, whats the demand for the rest?

    While Steve Keen's prediction of 40% losses on house prices may not happen, you would have to think a minimum of 10% should be a given. On higher priced houses, probably more.

    You only need to look at how fast this financial crisis is unwinding.
    12 months ago - Australia will be booming for another decade
    6 months ago - Australia will be ok because of China's demand.
    3 months ago - Australia will probably have a little slowdown
    Now - Australia is slowing rapidly but no recession
    3 months later - Recession
    6 months later - Bloody hell
    12 months time - Tin food, bomb shelter

    Ok, Ok, I got carried away. :)

    But I do believe we will all remember the 2008 "financial crisis" for the rest of our short lives. That goes without saying.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.