IBX - Potential 25 BAGGER!, page-195

think about this, and where we are going.
Pending trials.

Do we have a unique product, that improves the standard of care ?
Do people prefer to have biopsies, chunks of flesh removed just to check ? and risk a false negative. The bit they cut out, or the bit next to it , which has the cancer or not? or would they prefer a non invasive alternative that gives them a definitive result?
Do we offer early detection and staging of cancer ? or would you prefer for the cancer to growth 100x the size so it can be picked up visually on the existing imaging? And by that time has spread further ?
Do we offer a safer, non toxic MRI contrast than the existing gadolinium ? or would people prefer to have a toxic metal trapped in their bodies ?
Do people like the idea, that they could if using a non toxic alternative, have many tests, and monitoring scans without further building up toxic metals ?
Would people like to be able to treat cancer, like a chronic ailment, if newphase can succeed with their thermal treatment ?
Would people like to go to the doctors office, and get a scan in a particular area, to see if there is a response on hand held MRX for say prostate cancer ? others ?

What is this new standard of care worth ?
$$$$billions.