Which one is better value at current prices?
VPG has, per its 2008 annual report, NTA of 95c/share, NAV of 1.3$,gearing of 33%, and look-through gearing of 39% as at 30/6/2008. (These numbers are based on 95% asset revaluation at June 08 and before recent sales.)
Annual report presentation.
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20080826/pdf/31bwy3s62y939q.pdf
Page 4.
Page 15 of the report shows the Financial Position Summary.
Total assets $3,756M
NTA 95c
NAV $1.30.
Debt drawn down $1.311M.
Interest Cover 2.7x
---------
Whilst it is noted (page 8) that
a. most of its AUM and revenue is from Europe, with only 36% from Asia Pacific, and
b.its assets are mostly commercial and industrial properties which are more susceptible to economic downturn.
The current share price of 6.1 cents represents a far oversold level.
Its debt profile (page 17) seems to be healthy under the current environment with low level of debt (mostly short-term asset backed revolver) due in 2009.
Can anyone share some light on more detailed analysis of the company?
Thanks, L
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CER
- cer vs vpg at current prices of 0.083 vs 0.061
cer vs vpg at current prices of 0.083 vs 0.061
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)