I still think it's suss that the first new substantial holder in 3 years shows up just before delisting. Could it be that a deal has been made in exchange for votes on the delisting? The company needs 75% and will have trouble convincing retail to vote in favour.
Ann: G Medical seeks delisting to pursue Q4 NASDAQ listing, page-578
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 110 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)