why would shareholders agree to give two inexperienced directors control of the Board? looks like an amateur attempt at activism, especially when you have a major shareholder at 38% or so and therefore little chance of getting up so just ends up a waste of shareholder $'s and management time
Ann: Request received under section 249D of the Corporations Act, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)