Share
1,660 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1002
clock Created with Sketch. 05/09/20
09:54
Share
Originally posted by Harmattom:
↑
yes the model that weebit will be operating is to license our technology and with that we are not looking at making the chips ourselves but rather skim the licensing fee off the top. i feel the percentage will be significantly higher than the 1.5 you quote. that is the sort of percentage for tech that has been around for ten years. i feel weebit will be negotiating and achieving a much higher percentage. think someone else has said 4.5%. using that in your model we would require 9 billion in sales. I feel that is possible in the existing memory market never mind what awaits. china is going to exploit this next level of tech revolution like the uk did the industrial revolution and USA did the post war industrial and then tech revolutions. china, sth korea and a few others are investing heavily to exploit the next tech revolution. china knows that is the path to becoming the world superpower and knocking america off the perch. this isnt meant as a political post but more observing that tye need for memory and the uptaje of the next generation of memory will happen faster than any revolution ever before. if weebit positions itself to grab a few percent of that migration . . plus potentially patent fees from others . . plus specific revenue for adapting the tech for customers which they have noted will be happening then the numbers i reference will happen. just a question of how long.
Expand
You're forgetting to factor in the Non Recurring Engineering (NRE) fee of $5m per customer. Companies need to pay this fee to fit the chip to their product, then the royalties are paid on each chip fitted.
(20min delay)