At what point was unorthodox comparing the scalability of MSG and EN1. All that was focused on was the fact the MSG actually knows how to made a PROFIT. Thankfully that's something that all companies, listed on the ASX or not, should have in common: the goal to actually make a profit. Just like the local kid with a lemon stand. In this case, the 7 year old with a lemonade stand makes more profit in a weekend than EN1 ever has.
The only embarrassing thing is you holders trying to justify how EN1 is "diifferent" and, although saddled with millions in debt, is a very scalable. Let me be clear - unprofitable business models are less scalable than profitable ones.
Stop trying to insult other's intelligence, whilst throwing around words such as "multipliers", and pretending to know what you are talking about.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CTV
- Ann: EN1 Signs Top Weather Publisher
Ann: EN1 Signs Top Weather Publisher, page-85
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NVA
Nova locks in NASDAQ US market listing at a value of only US$3.3M as ASX gets quieter and quieter
MND
Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?