moreld we are waiting for your answers, page-3

Moreld,
It is good to see you calling other posters rude. Your posts reveal you for the fraud you are, one who will post LIES to spruik BTA.

Let us put your posts to the test who is RUDE, PROVEN UNEQUIVOCAL WRONG and IGNORANT.

QUOTE::
"They ignored the fact that shareholders had voted down a resolution to reward Peter Cook in the AGM. They showered Peter Cook with LTIOs and engaged in a company shares buyback by stealth."
NOT TRUE, TOTALLY FABRICATED OR SHOWS A LACK OF UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT ACTUALLY OCCURRED and what is in PCs contract. Did PC deserve bonus? No. Should he have rejected any bonuses for the year. YES. But it was all by the book.

moreld the LIAR shamelessly twisted her ignorant statement to:

Quote:
“Shareholders did vote down the 3b 2008 options grant. You said the board ignored the voting down. That is what I referred to as totally fabricated, perhaps I wasn't clear on that. At the AGM the Chairman explained why Biota would still have to find a way of awarding equivalent amount to PC. They didn't ignore the vote. You ignorance of that is no defence and your assertions merely reveal your closed mind.”

When shareholders voted down to reward Peter Cook with 453,600 LTIOs and the board went on to approve the 453,600 LTIOs. In Moreld’s twisted mind, the board did not ignore the shareholders vote.

Well done Moreld, you have proven beyond doubt you are nothing but a dishonest fool. Anyone honest person would have apologise instead of denying the board did not ignore the vote.
On 15 September Biota mailed out the notice of meeting to shareholders stating the chairman will direct proxy votes to support the election of Dr Montalto. After 40 days on a Friday, 24 October Biota announced they have changed their mind and will vote against Dr Montalto. They gave shareholder less than 2 working days (by 10am Monday 27 October) to withdraw their proxy. The notice would have expired by the time many shareholders read their mail on the Monday, the effect is equivalent to stealing the proxies to vote against Dr Montalto election.

We are still holding our breath for Moreld to tell us what was QUOTE:
too initially found that disgraceful. HOWEVER, AT THE AGM THIS WAS CLEARLY AND REASONABLY EXPLAINED. I now view it as a error of judgment. MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE IT WAS NOT.


http://www.hotcopper.com.au/post_single.asp?fid=1&tid=824878&msgid=4574685