In another post discussing the so called Russia investigation you listed various people convicted as a result.
For example, you said correctly Manafort was convicted and you tried to tar Trump with the same brush by association because as you correctly pointed out Manafort worked for Trump as his campaign director.
I asked you how long did Manafort work for him and how did the relationship terminate, you never answered.
The answer is, Manafort worked for Trump for 3 months and Trump sacked him. Therefore that weakened your "guilt by association" attempt.
I am saying that I am giving you benefit of the doubt. You would have answered honestly if you had seen the question or had not forgotten to answer. I'm right aren't I?
