we the shareholders
The judge was in the process of delivering his judgement and, in my opinion, he was clearly leaning towards granting costs to the applicant ( Leydin) Since, if I understood correctly, Pursell was a respondent and may have been on the hook personally for a portion of the costs, I believe he quickly gave that instruction so it didn't cost him anything. That is how I saw it
todays court proceedings, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add JRV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
-0.002(14.3%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.43M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.4¢ | 1.4¢ | 1.1¢ | $139.8K | 11.58M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 1883062 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3¢ | 2066666 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| JRV (ASX) Chart |