Your reasoning of share dilution leading to a 75% drop in price illogical and let me explain why.
But firstly ask yourself to answer one question honestly. Do you believe the company is in a better position now to deliver a machine than generate income or was it in a better position 3 years ago?
If you answered honestly you would say that the company is in a better position now than it was 3 years ago (or at the very least in the same position).
The market cap should theoretically be the value of the company.
If the company was correctly worth $170m 3 years ago, then I would think the company has demonstrated enough to indicate it is still worth $170m today.
Why has it dropped? I think Burlzey picked it, market sentiment has dropped. Perhaps on reflection could it have been overvalued 3 years ago when everyone thought they were going to make a quick buck a sentiment strong?
The fundamentals of this company are a hell of a lot better now than they were 3 years ago and if I only had a chance, this is the time when I have should have gotten in.
I think its very easy to push the dilution barrow, but I think on analysis the dilution has had only a small impact and to attribute a 75% drop is nonsense.
NGNG
FBR Price at posting:
5.6¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)