Ann: Date of AGM and Closing Date for Director Nominations, page-30

I've invested more than enough in multiple accounts to warrant having this conversation Art. They are not my friends, they are my employees and at this point in time, they are not delivery what is expected. Over 2 months ago, they stated that they had completed a passive seismic survey in order to strip away the transported cover with the aim of better identifying targets. So let's see what the top looks like. This information is known by some, therefore, they have a legal obligation to inform us. Targets 6 to 10 might be only 20 or even 300 metres below transported cover...They've known for months now and it's price sensitive. Have they started or even completed the EM's that were planned over 2 months ago? If they've found conductors, it's price sensitive. Even if they haven't, it's still price sensitive because people other than us are in the know. So Woodman wanted a geologist with what?.....A greater understanding than himself. Muccilli was already being used as a consultant, so why give him a seat at the table (Read further cost to our business) when Woodman is supposed to a geologist with 25 years up his sleeve? As far as I'm concerned, if Muccilli is better than Woodman and Woodman isn't selling the story, what are we paying Woodman for?

Our address alone should be worth an enterprise value of at least $20m. Woodman's not a mate of mine, he's just a guy who needs to be doing the job that he's being payed for.