new article re cde & criminal shorting, page-2

Good grief! Sounds like somebody is hurting with his half million CXC/CDE shares!

The article is not very well written, with numerous grammatical errors, and this detracts from any "authority" it could have had.

The letter to Pelosi is full of mixed metaphors, including three in the last sentence - "in your court", "nail in the economy", and "bite the bullet". I doubt that she'd take this seriously.

He also states - twice - that Australia has the uptick rule. It doesn't. It's been scrapped. I agree that it should be brought back, though.

The underlying theme of the article is something that I agree with, and is scandalous. But we're not going to get anywhere with fighting it.

If you agree with the underlying fundamenatals on CXC/CDE, then buy and hold. If not, then it can be traded short-term.

There seems little point in crying about what a company share price SHOULD be doing based on fundamentals, when the charts tell you in an instant what the price IS doing.