In the light of what has happened with TSI, to my understanding, with I-Pay, the e-surveillance growth, the new age ATM's (you know the ones that work as branches by offering more services), the mpos etc, plus being only one of the few companies to have a pan-India network to run this over, why it is only referred to as an ATM business? TSI have had a heap of hurdles, that would have killed most companies, but they still build, roll-out, invent and improve. A bit of capital and backing would, IMO, take it to a whole other level. ATM's are one product they have on their infrastructure network (a large part, but a part)
Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- VOR
- Ann: Proposed Sale of Cybersecurity Business
Ann: Proposed Sale of Cybersecurity Business, page-71
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)