I don't think anyone wants to address the massive risk the huge premium holds.
There used to be a reason for it... outperformance. I emphasise the key phrase "used to be".
The only thing holding it up now is retirees solely focused on dividends.
I notice the article in the paper talking about the disaster that is "Myer". Can anyone explain why they have persisted with this train wreck?
Ann: CIE: Target's Statement, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WAM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.62 |
Change
0.010(0.62%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.803B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.62 | $1.62 | $1.61 | $3.205M | 1.983M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 88994 | $1.61 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.62 | 443585 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WAM (ASX) Chart |